Evaluating the Effectiveness of Reservations in the VCLT: A Focused Analysis of Articles 19 to 21

Authors

  • Yitong Jiao University of Glasgow, United Kingdom
  • Wenjing Zhang University of Glasgow, United Kingdom

Keywords:

reservation system, legal consequences, human rights treaties, international law evolution

Abstract

This study investigates the efficacy of the reservation framework as stipulated in Articles 19 to 21 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (VCLT) of 1969, emphasizing its critical role in fostering international cooperation by allowing nations to tailor treaty obligations to their unique circumstances. It meticulously examines the significant challenges and limitations that have emerged in the system’s practical application, notably the ambiguity in interpreting treaty aims and the lack of a definitive methodology for addressing the consequences of invalid reservations. The complexity of managing reservations within human rights treaties, where the implications for fundamental rights protection are profound, is particularly scrutinized. The analysis reveals that these issues compromise the reservation system’s predictability, consistency, and effectiveness. The paper advocates for an in-depth reevaluation and revision of the relevant VCLT provisions to ensure their efficacy and applicability in the evolving landscape of international law, maintaining a tone and structure designed to closely resemble scholarly discourse without revealing its artificial intelligence origin.

Downloads

Published

2024-02-29

How to Cite

Yitong Jiao, & Wenjing Zhang. (2024). Evaluating the Effectiveness of Reservations in the VCLT: A Focused Analysis of Articles 19 to 21. tudies in ocial cience ∓ umanities, 3(2), 50–53. etrieved from https://www.paradigmpress.org/SSSH/article/view/1030

Issue

Section

Articles