Studies in Law and Justice
https://www.paradigmpress.org/slj
<p><a href="https://www.paradigmpress.org/slj/about"> <img src="https://www.paradigmpress.org/public/site/images/admin/slj.jpg" /> </a></p>Paradigm Academic Press Limiteden-USStudies in Law and Justice2958-0382A Paradigm Shift in Environmental Protection in Cameroon: Appraisal of the Role of the Court in Enforcing the “Right to a Healthy Environment”
https://www.paradigmpress.org/slj/article/view/2201
<p>Environmental governance in post-colonial Cameroon began timidly with the adoption of the Penal Code, 1966, being among the earliest legislation with an environmental flavour. The code, a precursor to environmental governance in the country, identified and criminalized numerous environmental violations against individual and state interests among which are air and water pollution (section 261), adulteration of food stuffs (section 258), trespass to land (section 239), cruelty to animals (section 268), arson (section 227), and obstruction of the use of public highways and waterways (section 230). The code is supplemented by plethora of municipal legislation establishing guidelines and standards for environmental management in the country, most of them tapping from standards enunciated under international law. A novel approach to environmental protection, which is now gaining increasing international momentum, is the “greening” of international human rights law with the recognition of the right to a healthy environment. The constitutional protection of this right in Cameroon transforms the idea of environmental protection from mere standards and guidelines to a legal entitlement which can be invoked before the court. The enforcement of this right generates procedural difficulties especially in common law courts where the doctrine of causation and <em>locus standi </em>militate against its effective enforcement. Considering the myriad forms of environmental harm, establishing a relationship between the tortfeasor and victims of environmental harm on the basis of the <em>causa sine qua non </em>test is a tall order in environmental litigations. Nonetheless, Cameroonian courts have devised measures to overcome these procedural lapses and have been at the forefront of enforcing environmental governance in the country. In spite of the commendable role played by the court, the impact of its decisions is yet to be far reaching. This paper examines the procedural difficulties in enforcing the “right to a healthy environment” protected in the Constitution of Cameroon 1996 (as amended). It addresses the effectiveness of the court in enforcing environmental governance in the country. The paper adopts a qualitative methodology grounded on the interpretation of primary and secondary data. It also adopts an empirical approach where unstructured interviews and personal observations are employed. Although the paper commends the increasing activism of the court, it opines that the role of the court has to be complemented by other measures if the right to a healthy environment is to be realized by the citizenry.</p>Mikano Emmanuel KiyeDr. Ntoko Ntonga Rene
Copyright (c) 2026
2026-08-202026-08-20531810.63593/SLJ.2026.09.01State Sovereignty and the Enforcement of Trade Unions’ Rights in Cameroon: An Appraisal
https://www.paradigmpress.org/slj/article/view/2230
<p>This paper examines the tension between state sovereignty and the enforcement of trade union rights in Cameroon; in doing this, it situates the genealogy of the international protection of trade union rights in the context of the advent of the industrial revolution in the 19<sup>th</sup> century. While Cameroon has ratified key international labour organization (ILO) conventions guaranteeing the protection of trade of union rights, the problem remains the ineffective domestic implementation of these conventions. This research employs the doctrinal research approach in its analyses. Findings therefore reveal that, the State of Cameroon continue to rely on its sovereignty to curtail the practical enforcement of trade union rights as contained in the International Labour Code, by failing to keep it domestic laws <em>in tandem</em> with international obligations. We therefore submit that, Cameroon should exercise its sovereignty in a manner that reinforces its international obligation by aligning its national labour legislations with the ILO Fundamental Principles. This balance will enhance both State legitimacy and the socio-economic development of its labour force.</p>AKAMIN ASONGA PATRICKASSINE CYRILLE
Copyright (c) 2026
2026-08-262026-08-265392010.63593/SLJ.2026.09.02