Impulse or Self-Expression? How Social Media Challenges Influence the Decision-Making Process of Young Users

Abstract

Social media challenges have become a defining aspect of digital culture, particularly among young users who engage in them for entertainment, social validation, and self-expression. While many challenges are harmless, others encourage risky behaviors, raising concerns about impulsive decision-making, peer pressure, and platform responsibility. This study examines the psychological, social, and cognitive mechanisms that drive young users to participate in viral challenges, distinguishing between impulse-driven actions and intentional self-expression.

The research explores how instant gratification, social identity formation, and emotional arousal influence engagement, alongside external factors such as online communities, influencer culture, and algorithm-driven exposure. Cognitive processes, including impulsive vs. reflective thinking, risk perception biases, and content framing, play a significant role in decision-making, often leading users to overlook potential physical and psychological consequences. Case studies of past viral challenges highlight the fine line between engaging trends and dangerous behaviors, emphasizing the need for regulatory oversight, platform accountability, and digital literacy education.

As social media continues to evolve, ensuring user safety without restricting creativity requires a multi-stakeholder approach, involving tech companies, policymakers, educators, and content creators. This paper provides future recommendations for fostering a safer digital environment, advocating for enhanced content moderation, AI-driven risk detection, ethical influencer practices, and improved media literacy programs. By understanding the motivations and consequences of social media challenge participation, we can develop more effective strategies to balance digital engagement with user protection.